Back to Canon Lenses

Canon 70-210mm f/4 Review

27

The Canon 72-210mm f/4 lens is a budget option for telephoto work, but it lacks image stabilization, has poor autofocus, and produces weak picture quality on both full-frame and APS-C cameras.

The Canon 72-210mm f/4 lens is a budget option for telephoto work, but it lacks image stabilization, has poor autofocus, and produces weak picture quality on both full-frame and APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Long telephoto range
  • Solid build quality
  • Smooth push-pull zoom mechanism
Cons
  • Lacks image stabilization
  • Poor autofocus
  • Weak picture quality

The build quality of the lens feels solid, but it is a bit ugly and has a small front element.

The Canon 72-210mm f/4 lens is a budget option for telephoto work, but it lacks image stabilization, has poor autofocus, and produces weak picture quality on both full-frame and APS-C cameras. The lens also suffers from significant vignetting, distortion, and lacks sharpness, especially at wider apertures. The build quality of the lens feels solid, but it is a bit ugly and has a small front element. The push-pull zoom mechanism is smooth, but the focus ring is difficult to use and the lens lacks full-time manual focus. Overall, the Canon 72-210mm f/4 lens falls short of expectations and does not offer the level of performance expected from a telephoto lens, even at its budget price point.

Overall, the Canon 72-210mm f/4 lens falls short of expectations and does not offer the level of performance expected from a telephoto lens, even at its budget price point.

Source

This article is based on the review by

Christopher Frost

Christopher Frost

Christopher Frost is a YouTube channel dedicated to providing in-depth reviews and analyses of photography equipment, particularly lenses. Christopher Frost, the creator and host of the channel, is known for his thorough and detailed evaluations of various lenses from different manufacturers, including Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, and others.  To learn more, please visit the channel here.

See reviews